The Right to Information Act, 2005 already provides for imposition of penalty and recommendation of disciplinary action by the Central Information Commission/State Information Commission, as the case may be, against the Public Information Officer who has knowingly given incorrect, incomplete or misleading information under the RTI Act. Govt. reply in this regard in Parliament:-
Press Information Bureau
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
08-May-2013
Furnishing Wrong Information
There are a number of cases where an applicant has filed first appeal with the First Appellate Authority in the Public Authority concerned and second appeal/complaint with the Central Information Commission/State Information , as the case may be, inter-alia, due to the following reasons:
(i) Non-receipt of information within prescribed time;
(i) Non-receipt of information within prescribed time;
(ii) Denial of request of information;
(iii) If he/she believes that incomplete/misleading or false information under this Act has been given by the Public Information Officer.
The number of second appeals/complaints registered by the Central Information Commission during three years is as under:
2009-10
|
2010-11
|
2011-12
|
22800
|
28875
|
33922
|
The Right to Information Act, 2005 already provides for imposition of penalty and recommendation of disciplinary action by the Central Information Commission/State Information Commission, as the case may be, against the Public Information Officer who has knowingly given incorrect, incomplete or misleading information under the RTI Act. The CIC/SICs have been imposing such penalties and also recommending disciplinary action against such Public Information Officers.
This was stated by Shri V. Narayanasamy, Minister of State in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension and Minister of State in the Prime Minister’s Office in written reply to a question by Shri Bharat Ram Meghwal today.
0 comments:
Post a Comment